Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Milwaukee Miami UNDER 202.5 (199.5) REST5 (Win by 12.5)

Monday, January 29, 2007

Orlando Atlanta UNDER 181 (187) REST5 (Win by 5)

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Utah New Orleans OVER 192 (193.5) REST2 (Lose by 15)

Friday, January 26, 2007

Washington Detroit UNDER 205 (202) REST5 (Win by 10)
Charlotte Lakers UNDER 207 (200.5) REST6 (Win by 4)

Thursday, January 25, 2007

New Jersey Clippers OVER 189.5(194) REST3 (Win by13.5)

Monday, January 22, 2007

San Antonio Boston OVER 183.5 (193.5) REST3 (Lose by 1.5)

Saturday, January 20, 2007

I am sick of THIS SHIT. These picks will win or its all fixed

Memphis Clippers UNDER 220.5 (198) REST6 (Win by 17.5)
Sacramento Detroit OVER 192.5 (196.5) REST2 (Lose 27.5)
Orlando New Jersey OVER 180 (190) REST2 (Win by 15)

Boston Washington OVER 208 (205) REST2 (Win by 17)

Friday, January 19, 2007

Washington Orlando UNDER 205 (199) REST5 (Lose by 2....fuck this shit)
Portland Phoenix UNDER 204.5 (201) REST4 (Lose by 2.5.....goddam these niggers)
Cleveland Denver UNDER 194 (197.5) REST7 (Lose by 15.......what the fuck is this shyte?)

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Phoenix Houston OVER 200 (200) REST3 (Lose by 9...what the fuck happened in the 4th quarter)

Monday, January 15, 2007


Miami Lakers UNDER 209 (200) REST5 (Lose by 34....fucking 3-fest)

Saturday, January 13, 2007


New Orleans +.5 teased with Indianapolis +10 (-110)------The Ravens line of -4 i think is a pretty good line taking into account the Ravens' defensive superiority at home, coming off a bye, etc. However, I wouldnt bet them because i'm not sure that they win(though they probably should considering certain advantages). Indy can score really fast when they need to and i cant see them getting blown out. SHOULD be a competitive game where 10 points covers easily. The New Orleans game is different because the Eagles are overrated and should definitely lose. I dont like their players, I don't respect their late-season "hotness" against Washington, Carolina, Dallas, Atlanta and the Giants. And I still resent the fact that i lost money on them AT HOME, with McNabb, when Jacksonville held them to only 6 points. Bush, Colston, Brees......yeah, i like that. (Win by 19 and 3.5)

Boston Detroit OVER 183.5 (195) REST2 (Lose by 29.5....Oh, Boston has high school hero, NBA zero Sebastian Telfair now....no wonder they suck like hell)
New Jersey Minnesota OVER 185.5 (192) REST3 (Win by 21.5)
Cleveland Clippers UNDER 188 (189.5) REST5 (Lose by 8)

Friday, January 12, 2007

*Minnesota Memphis UNDER 217.5 (194.5) REST5 (Lose by 9....please drop out of the NBA Memphis you pieces of shit)

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Toronto Milwaukee OVER 198 (202) REST3 (Lose by 31....Milwaukee's ill)
Portland Dallas OVER 185.5 (190) REST2 (Lose by 12.5.....No more overs with Portland)
Orlando Golden State UNDER 207 (199) REST6 (Win by 39)

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Seattle Phoenix UNDER 219 (207) REST5 (Win by 4)
Cleveland Sacramento UNDER 196.5 (194.5) REST6 (Lose by 9.5)

Monday, January 08, 2007


Florida +14.5 teased with Florida/Ohio State OVER 39 (-130) (Win by 41.5 and 16)
Florida +14.5 teased with Florida/Ohio State UNDER 53 (-130)--------Clearly now, Michigan sucks and OSU's win over them at home proves nothing. OSU's victory over Texas (24-7) came with 2 Texas turnovers against none for OSU AND Texas rushed for 5.5 yards per carry for a total of 170 yards. True, OSU had 3 turnovers in the Michigan game and maybe would have beaten Michigan worse if that hadnt happened. But Michigan sucks AND Hart rushed for 6 yards per carry against OSU. Statistically, these rush defenses look good but i think they will turnout to be a little overrated. Auburn rushed for 170 yards vs Florida. Thus, I believe that the total is right.....both offenses should be able to balance their passing and rushing with equal success and the total should fall in the 40's. And I am not impressed at OSU's beatdowns on Northwestern, Indiana and other weak Big-10 teams not including Wisconsin(cuz they didnt play them). Florida played and beat LSU, Arkansas, Tennessee and South Carolina. If they can do that, and then go and get blown out by a team that only beat sorry Michigan by 3, Im willing to lose 2.6units. (i've been ice cold in football so im not putting much on this.....but I think this is a good way to bet the game and pick up 2 wins) (Lose by 2 ---Thanks, Florida, for going for it on 4th down when, if you any fucking class you'd have just kicked the damn field goal. And thanks Tressel, for going for it on 4th down stupidly on your own 30 and giving Florida an easy touchdown. No class and no brains. Big-10 sux.)

Aliens exist
UNITED AIRLINES------"Fly the UFO-friendly skies"

"But I know that what I saw and what a lot of other people saw stood out very clearly, and it definitely was not an [Earth] aircraft," the mechanic said.
One United employee appeared emotionally shaken by the sighting and "experienced some religious issues" over it, one co-worker said........

Some said they were interviewed by United officials and instructed to write reports and draw pictures of what they observed, and that they were advised by United officials to refrain from speaking about what they saw.

FAA spokeswoman Elizabeth Isham Cory said............
"Our theory on this is that it was a weather phenomenon. That night was a perfect atmospheric condition in terms of low (cloud) ceiling and a lot of airport lights. When the lights shine up into the clouds, sometimes you can see funny things."

This crap is unacceptable. Twelve different United employees saw it. United told them not to talk about it. (WHY?) Both the FAA and United LIED about the fact that they had received reports and then had to confess to their lies after a Freedom of Information Act query by the Chicago Tribune. But this message board post says it best:

"oh so fashionable to call out FAKE nowadays, even if an alien walked out from the spaceship in 1080i and said 'I am a fucking alien look at my webbed feet and my sketchy eyes, watch my spit melt concrete' it wouldn't matter one bit. Thanks to our 'pwned' teenage culture."

I would say its because of our SCARED-AS-FUCK-OF-THE-UNKNOWN culture. UNITED was 'pwned' by aliens.......and its apparently a dirty little secret. Go bankrupt, UNITED, you are a lying, failing, alien-monitored airline.

Saturday, January 06, 2007


Chiefs Colts UNDER 56.5 teased with Western Michigan Cincinatti UNDER 48.5--------Chiefs are a 40.5 points per game team and Colts are a 49 points per game. Statistically, the total should be 45 yet it is 50.5. And the Chiefs just dont pass. Even against average rush defenses they dont pass. With Indy's defense being weak against the run(everyone knows this), it is a lock that KC will attempt a lot of rushes. Indy knows that if they stop the run, they win. And i dont think KC's offense is very good anyway. Green is a weak passer and Colts pass defense is good. If KC gets behind and has to pass, they should fail miserably. I believe that Cincinatti's defense is much better than it may appear. they've had to play Ohio State, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Rutgers......jeez, they've played a MUCH tougher schedule than Western Michigan. WMU plays in the MAC and they didnt even dominate in the MAC. Cincy's offense is not that good and they often pass fewer than 20 times per game(their 1st QB is questionable on the injury list). Even when Cincy was getting blown out by Ohio State and had no chance to win, they only passed 25 times in the game. Cincy clearly prefers to rush and WMU's rush defense only allows 71 yards per game(that's statistically good but with their weak schedule.....who knows). Oh, i forgot, Cincy also played Louisville and held them to ONLY 23 POINTS! Cincy COULD be stopped on offense and certainly will destroy Western on defense. (Lose by 2.5-------Sick....I feel ill about this. Sometimes you have to keep relearning the same lesson: when a team has a good rush defense, their opponent often gets wise and passes.....Cincinatti passes 35 times---way more than their norm----and the total goes over. Terrible play. If I said that Cincy prefers to run and not pass, and WMU is good against the rush, then Cincy is handicapped in this game. Thus, it would make sense to play WMU + points. And, yes, they covered. But i couldnt do that looking at the differences in scheduling strength.)

Portland Sacramento UNDER 194 (196) REST5 (Lose by 21...to add insult to injury, this game would have gone under if not for OT.....sick)
Utah Denver OVER 206.5 (205) REST2 (Lose by 26.5.....Denver is terrible now...what a sick joke this day was)

Thursday, January 04, 2007


Indiana Dallas UNDER 190 (191) REST7 (Lose by 1)

Wednesday, January 03, 2007


Milwaukee Washington UNDER 227 (212) REST8 (Win by 14)
Cleveland Boston OVER 186.5 (192.5) REST3 (Win by 24.5)
San Antonio Minnesota OVER 185 (188.5) REST3 (Win by 19)
New York Portland OVER 188 (195) REST3 (Lose by 8)

Tuesday, January 02, 2007


Golden State New Orleans UNDER 197.5 (198) REST6 (Win by 11.5)
Phoenix Chicago UNDER 213.5 (206.5) REST5 (Win by 20.5)
Knicks Sacramento UNDER 198 (200.5) REST5 (Lose by 14)