BANNED FOR WINNING
And he said: "These are the directions I have. I have directions to execute this." And I said, "Well, I think it's too deep." And he said, "Well, it's the directions we have, and we're going to execute those."
So I said, "Well, Charlie, what do you think?" To the best of my memory, Charlie said, "Well, if you do this, you're going to drive 40,000 to 50,000 Baathists underground by nightfall. The number is closer to 50,000 than it is [to] 30,000."
A fine PBS Frontline expose of how Bush administration fascism, executing an ostensibly anti-fascist de-Baathification strategy, actually engendered the anti-U.S. insurgency in Iraq.
But the Baathists are not the only ones who were driven underground. BannedChatterLateInformation(BCLI) has also been driven underground after a TradeSports Chat conspiracy resulted in it being banned. The question is: Why? We know that BCLI was reported by the notorious chatter '23'. This chatter's psychological profile reads:
probable former name: 'Jeter-23'. probable location: New York area. mental state: pissed that Yankees lost, pissed due to his Denver -14.5 going down while BCLI was touting Oakland +14.5. Education: probably limited due to demonstrated lack of ability to express himself or contribute to TS Chat in any meaningful or worthwhile manner.
BCLI's alleged crime, typing a link into the chat leading clicks to this site, the BCLI site, seems to be relatively minor considering that links are posted in the chatbox all the time leading people to sites containing a wide variety of content. Could '23' have been offended by BCLI's content? Well, I think that's the only reasonable explanation. It is extraordinarily offensive to the psyche of a losing gambler to be reminded that others are winning. And BCLI's unabashed, documented and irrefutable winning content can have an inflammatory effect on those who are struggling with their own losses. Curiously, TradeSports chat does tolerate some types of offensive posting. For example, lets review this TS chat sample:
drugtest (in VIP Room): a rabbi walks into a bar with a frog on his shoulder
drugtest (in VIP Room): the bartender says "where did you get him?"
23 (in VIP Room): israel
drugtest (in VIP Room): the frog says "Brooklyn, there's hundreds of them!"
Could I falsely identify myself as a Jew offended by this joke and make the TS authorities ban these chatters? Probably, but maybe not. Both these chatters have traded more contracts than I have and TS probably takes that into account considering that one chatter who has only traded about 2700 contracts claims to have reported BCLI and that the TS authorities didnt respond to his request for BCLI's banning. Well, the nefarious '23' has traded over 100,000 contracts and when he snitched on BCLI, the TS authorities BANNED BCLI PROMPTLY. Ok, I'll refrain from further speculation about '23's motivation for requesting a banning of BCLI. It doesnt matter. He has made his contribution to TS chat and become a hero to BCLI-haters: Heroism through snitching. But can he make any other contribution to TS chat? I mean, besides completing a mildly anti-semitic joke. I doubt it. And just because I possibly COULD get '23' banned if i reported him, I will not. Telling the teacher, sending someone to the principal's office, snitching, banning people.......that's totally not me and I strongly disapprove of it. BCLI has integrity and will not descend to the base level of jealousy and petty resentment embodied in an action like "Hey, I'm 23 and I've traded 100,000 contracts and since I'm still a whiny little jealous bitch I want BCLI banned because he wins too much and technically he has violated the terms of service."
Mets +115 over Stl----Maine gave up only 2 hits in 4 innings last time and during the season he was very hard to hit; harder to hit than Carpenter. Carpenter WAS hit by the Mets last time and I think he's a little overrated. Mets are a better offense, though in this series they've scored 1 less run than the Cardinals. Surprisingly, the Mets were shut down twice by Weaver and this does say something about how their offense is currently underperforming. However, if Maine can refrain from walking people(he only walked 1 every 2.8 innings during the regular season which isnt bad) and the Mets offense can perform up to their potential, Mets should win. A lot of pressure on them, sure, but just because the Yankees cant handle it doesnt mean they can't.
And he said: "These are the directions I have. I have directions to execute this." And I said, "Well, I think it's too deep." And he said, "Well, it's the directions we have, and we're going to execute those."
So I said, "Well, Charlie, what do you think?" To the best of my memory, Charlie said, "Well, if you do this, you're going to drive 40,000 to 50,000 Baathists underground by nightfall. The number is closer to 50,000 than it is [to] 30,000."
A fine PBS Frontline expose of how Bush administration fascism, executing an ostensibly anti-fascist de-Baathification strategy, actually engendered the anti-U.S. insurgency in Iraq.
But the Baathists are not the only ones who were driven underground. BannedChatterLateInformation(BCLI) has also been driven underground after a TradeSports Chat conspiracy resulted in it being banned. The question is: Why? We know that BCLI was reported by the notorious chatter '23'. This chatter's psychological profile reads:
probable former name: 'Jeter-23'. probable location: New York area. mental state: pissed that Yankees lost, pissed due to his Denver -14.5 going down while BCLI was touting Oakland +14.5. Education: probably limited due to demonstrated lack of ability to express himself or contribute to TS Chat in any meaningful or worthwhile manner.
BCLI's alleged crime, typing a link into the chat leading clicks to this site, the BCLI site, seems to be relatively minor considering that links are posted in the chatbox all the time leading people to sites containing a wide variety of content. Could '23' have been offended by BCLI's content? Well, I think that's the only reasonable explanation. It is extraordinarily offensive to the psyche of a losing gambler to be reminded that others are winning. And BCLI's unabashed, documented and irrefutable winning content can have an inflammatory effect on those who are struggling with their own losses. Curiously, TradeSports chat does tolerate some types of offensive posting. For example, lets review this TS chat sample:
drugtest (in VIP Room): a rabbi walks into a bar with a frog on his shoulder
drugtest (in VIP Room): the bartender says "where did you get him?"
23 (in VIP Room): israel
drugtest (in VIP Room): the frog says "Brooklyn, there's hundreds of them!"
Could I falsely identify myself as a Jew offended by this joke and make the TS authorities ban these chatters? Probably, but maybe not. Both these chatters have traded more contracts than I have and TS probably takes that into account considering that one chatter who has only traded about 2700 contracts claims to have reported BCLI and that the TS authorities didnt respond to his request for BCLI's banning. Well, the nefarious '23' has traded over 100,000 contracts and when he snitched on BCLI, the TS authorities BANNED BCLI PROMPTLY. Ok, I'll refrain from further speculation about '23's motivation for requesting a banning of BCLI. It doesnt matter. He has made his contribution to TS chat and become a hero to BCLI-haters: Heroism through snitching. But can he make any other contribution to TS chat? I mean, besides completing a mildly anti-semitic joke. I doubt it. And just because I possibly COULD get '23' banned if i reported him, I will not. Telling the teacher, sending someone to the principal's office, snitching, banning people.......that's totally not me and I strongly disapprove of it. BCLI has integrity and will not descend to the base level of jealousy and petty resentment embodied in an action like "Hey, I'm 23 and I've traded 100,000 contracts and since I'm still a whiny little jealous bitch I want BCLI banned because he wins too much and technically he has violated the terms of service."
Mets +115 over Stl----Maine gave up only 2 hits in 4 innings last time and during the season he was very hard to hit; harder to hit than Carpenter. Carpenter WAS hit by the Mets last time and I think he's a little overrated. Mets are a better offense, though in this series they've scored 1 less run than the Cardinals. Surprisingly, the Mets were shut down twice by Weaver and this does say something about how their offense is currently underperforming. However, if Maine can refrain from walking people(he only walked 1 every 2.8 innings during the regular season which isnt bad) and the Mets offense can perform up to their potential, Mets should win. A lot of pressure on them, sure, but just because the Yankees cant handle it doesnt mean they can't.
posted by BannedChatter at 3:43 AM
4 Comments:
how is that joke antin-semetic in any way?
well, Drugtest, the Reptile is personalized when the assumption is that the Rabbi would be personalized. In the disruption of this assumption....all Jews in Brooklyn are Reptilized.
If this explanation makes no sense, then explain why and for what reason BCLI got banned? Whatever explanation you come up with, it will make no more sense than the explanation of the joke I've given above.
Something can make sense and still be wrong. Jews in Brooklyn reptilized? Gimme a break.
The reason you got banned, I presume, is that you posted a link to a site (yours) that features naked women, which is a violation of TS's T.O.S. You already know this, why play dumb?
1) The reason I got banned is because '23' REPORTED me, like he threatened to do. The process of being banned is an arbitrary one. I have clicked links to naked-women-pictures sites that were posted in Tradesports chat. It is not a violation unless the pictures are considered "vulgar" or "obscene"----the definitions of such words are, of course, arbitrary. If I'm a high-volume trader and I report to TS that something posted is "offensive" to me, they'll probably listen to what I'm saying and execute the banning.
2) ok, explain the point of the joke if you think I dont understand it. If you want to prove that you're not anti-semitic, drugtest, then post and tout this Israeli sports-betting website on TS chat: http://www.winnerp.net/winnerp/index.php
3)The BCLI-Beauties are simply a graphic representation of the BCLI aesthetic. Winning, of course, is the experience of beauty. (If that makes no sense to you, start betting some BCLI plays). The BCLI site neither intends, nor offers, any offensiveness except to those jealous, wretched haters who wish failure upon others. Case in point...
4)We all know that I would not have been banned had the BCLI tout pick in TS chat been Denver -14.5(a loser) rather than Oakland +14.5(a winner). This because, if that had been the case, the jealous hater '23' would never have had the resentment to motivate him to ask for the banning of BCLI.
5)Bottom line(if you still dont get it) if the link to this site had been posted in TS chat before on multiple occasions, why wasnt BCLI banned then? Answer: nobody cared, no, HATED enough to complain.
Post a Comment
<< Home